Grid Panel: Microgrids, Renewables Are Key

L to R: Delphine Hou, CAISO, Sarah Scafidi, Cadmus, Erik Takayesu, SCE, Marjorie Sun, China-US Energy Innovation Alliance, Jana Ganion, Chris Benjamin, PGE, He Jianzong, Dongguan Power Bureau, Wei Feng, LBNL, Cameron Briggs, Origin, Lexon Li, Altec.

Eight experts from China, Australia, and the U.S. were on our terrific panel on “Grid Resilience: How Do We Strengthen It?” on Sept. 14 in San Francisco. For a recording of the panel, click here. Downloadable to your phone or computer!

Among the panel takeaways:

  • Check out efforts in China to build grid resilience. He Jianzong has invented a laser to zap mylar balloons that can cause  outages when they hit power lines. Really.
  • Increasing microgrids and renewables are keys to enhancing grid resilience.
  • What’s a duck curve and why is it important? (Hint: Listen to Delphine Hou’s presentation.)
  • Looking for a model of microgrid resilience? See what Sendai, Japan has done. Its microgrid  has helped Fukushima recover from the tsunami and its nuclear disaster, according to Wei Feng.
  • Jana Ganion has led innovative microgrid development at Blue Lake Rancheria in northern California.

The panelists were:
China Southern Grid. HE Jianzong, Deputy Director, Dongguan Power of Guangdong Power, a subsidiary of China Southern Grid.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Dr. Wei FENG of LBNL’s China Energy Group. Expert on smart grid and microgrids in China and U.S.
–Origin, Inc., Australia’s largest energy provider and longtime partner in Chinese power projects. Cameron Briggs. Head of Future Energy.
Jana Ganion. Sustainability and Government Affairs Director, Blue Lake Rancheria, California, a federally recognized tribal government.
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). Chris Benjamin. Director of Corporate Sustainability.
Southern California Edison (SCE). Erik Takayesu. Managing Director of Integrated Innovation and Modernization.
California Independent System Operator (CAISO). Delphine Hou. Manager, State Regulatory Affairs.
Cadmus Group. Sarah Scafidi. Head of business resilience practice.
William Kissinger. Panel moderator. Partner at Morgan Lewis, who focuses on energy and environmental issues.

More than 70 attended the event. The panel was organized in partnership with the Global Climate Action Summit.

Many thanks to our event partners, Morgan Lewis for hosting, the Energy Cooperation Program in Beijing, and Altec. We are deeply grateful to our financial corporate sponsors, PG&E, SCE, and Honeywell.



Alliance Panel on Grid Resilience Wins Climate Summit Approval

UHV grid beijing
Mega-Transmission Lines in Beijing. Ice coating is said to be a significant resilience problem to China’s grid in the northern half of the country. Photo by Marjorie Sun

California is hosting the Global Action Climate Summit this September in San Francisco. It’s a sequel to COP21 in Paris.  Summit organizers asked for proposals for affiliate events. We proposed organizing an expert panel on “How to Enhance Grid Resilience?”

After weeks of waiting, we’re in!

We’ll bring together a broad range of experts (see below) for a 2-hour panel before an international audience. The purpose is to showcase the pioneering efforts in California, other states, and China, to strengthen grid resilience in the face of climate change and other shocks. These include earthquakes and cyberattacks. Panelists will share common challenges, opportunities, and best practices to accelerate equitable, innovative solutions in the public and private sectors.

Confirmed panelists so far include experts from PG&E, Southern California Edison, California Independent Systems Operators (CAISO), Cadmus Group and Origin, which is Australia’s largest energy provider and does a lot of business in China.

So mark your calendars. The panel is Friday, September 14, 10 a.m. to noon, at the law offices of Morgan Lewis, One Market, San Francisco. (The Summit itself runs September 12 to 14.) We’ll post updates on the event and ticket info soon.


China’s Coal at Home and Now Abroad

In China, what are the risks of a rise of 1.5 degree C and how can low carbon solutions be accelerated? These will be the key issues of a day-long conference on May 30 in Beijing. NRDC, the Natural Resources Defense Council, is organizing the meeting. Top Chinese government and academic researchers are among the speakers.

In the past, China was said to have built a coal-fired power plant every day. But those days are over. Last year, China built 25 GW of new coal-fired power capacity. That’s half of what it used to be. China’s coal production inched up by 0.4 percent last year. Demand for energy was strong mainly because the economy improved and exports boomed, according to a China energy expert in an interview earlier this month in Beijing. Among the big problems that remain is the widespread use of distributed coal.

How can China cut its coal use? China is now the world leader in installed capacity of solar and wind energy and has plans to install even more. But curtailment is still a big problem. Solving curtailment would mean China’s coal use would actually decrease, the expert said.

China has been enormously successful in implementing energy efficiency measures. By saving energy, China has slashed its energy demand by 10 to 15 percent. With such success, it will be harder in the future for China to find ways to improve energy efficiency,  the expert said.

Meanwhile, a major concern now is to what degree China is incorporating sustainability in its construction of huge infrastructure projects overseas as part of its One Belt One Road initiative, now in its fifth year. Chinese sponsored projects account for most of the new coal fired power plants being built overseas, according to an article in the New York Times last year. A policy researcher at a Chinese research institute in Beijing said in an interview that his group is working to integrate renewables into the OBOR initiative. Without these and other sustainable measures, China’s infrastructure projects overseas will undercut the gains domestically in cutting carbon emissions.


China’s Green Mountain Motto

With a government restructuring, China now aims to pair economic growth with environmental protection. The iconic rectangular CCTV building, on the horizon, shrouded in smog last week in Beijing.

“Green mountains are more valuable than silver or gold mountains.” For the past year or so, that’s the environmental slogan that China’s President Xi Jinping has been espousing. Now, his message seems to be getting even more traction among other senior government officials in rhetoric and action.

I’m just back from Beijing after attending last week the Paulson Institute’s annual sustainability conference. (Yes, the air pollution was awful. More on that in a minute.) The conference is regularly attended by very high level representatives from governments, private sector and NGOs. Former Treasury Secretary, Henry Paulson, in partnership with the University of Chicago, established the institute to promote green economies in China and the United States.

At the conference last week, top Chinese government officials touted the same message: China has achieved great economic success at the expense of the environment, but this has to be rebalanced. “Our society has entered a new era. Green development is the answer to this era….We can no longer compromise on the environment, ” said Shi Zihai, a top official of China’s powerful National Reform and Development Commission (NDRC).

To its enormous credit, China’s economic growth has raised the standard of living for hundreds of millions of people. China has made extraordinary gains in clean energy. In a short period, it’s become the world’s leader in solar and wind installations and EV manufacturing and deployment, for example. China’s also created one of the world’s largest funds for green bonds.

To do more to protect the environment, the national government earlier this year reorganized two agencies to strengthen environmental protection domestically and internationally. It mandated that climate change policy and enforcement responsibilities be shifted from NDRC to the Ministry of Ecology and Environment. Now this may seem merely bureaucratic reshuffling. But one Beijing expert on China’s environment said last week in an interview that this is a positive change for the environment. He said, “MEE is now more powerful” than before. Under the agencies’ restructuring, “environmental protection has been decoupled from economic development,” which is the purview of NDRC. He said MEE can now act as the police for the environment.

The most obvious test perhaps would be solving the dreadful air pollution in major cities. The day I landed in Beijing, the air quality index in Beijing spiked to 400, a level deemed hazardous to everyone. That day, a colleague’s young daughter sung outside in that foul air for a school performance. As soon as it was over, my friend hustled her daughter inside for the rest of the day.  Beijing’s AQI stayed above 100 the entire week I was there, a level that affects sensitive groups, including young children and the elderly.  Greenpeace says that last year smog in China improved the least amount annually since the nation’s war on pollution began in 2013.

This week Beijing announced that motor vehicles are now the main culprit for its air pollution, not coal, and last year accounted for 45 percent of PM2.5 particles. This despite the fact that car ownership in Beijing is exceedingly difficult. To get a license plate, you must certify you have a parking space and then apply to a lottery. If you want to buy an EV, your odds are better–or at least you’d have more certainty. The wait list for an EV license plate in Beijing is three years. Still, motor vehicles have overtaken coal as a bigger source of pollution there.

The challenge for China, as the national government knows well, is to find ways to create green mountains faster so that its children can play safely outside any day.



China’s First Steps in Nationwide Emissions Trading

China is poised to announce a national carbon emissions trading system this week. The start of the program is likely to be far less ambitious than originally hoped for. Nevertheless its overarching goal remains admirable.

China likely won’t address many details yet, experts in China and the U.S. say. There are issues of monitoring, reporting, and verification. The program still needs baseline data. And the Chinese are unlikely to say much about the regulatory requirements or what sectors will be covered. There’s a decent chance that the trading scheme will cover the power sector.

It’s not surprising that China is not yet ready to launch a full-scale program. As a point of reference, California took several years to launch its own cap and trade program. China’s program will be much larger than California’s. Just four years ago, China launched seven pilot programs in emissions trading in various locations across the nation. At the same time, it set an extremely ambitious target to kick off a national program this year.

Experts say to watch the process in which China incrementally builds up its emissions trading program to a national scale. The irony is that China is seizing the initiative to construct a national emissions trading program using capital markets. That’s the farthest thing from the Trump Administration, which instead is hell bent to promote the coal industry and withdraw from the Paris accord.